Thesis and Final Exam requirements
Final Exam requirements
Find detailed graduation information regarding all of our BA and MA programmes in the "LIST OF STUDY UNITS" documents or in the list below.
AMERICAN STUDIES MA
Excerpt of the requirements:
American Studies MA (valid for students admitted in 2017 and thereinafter)_excerpt
Study Programme: American Studies (language of instruction: English) Level of education (BA/MA): MA Valid for students admitted in 2017 and thereafter
Components of the Final Examination:
The final examination consists of two parts: the defense of the thesis and the examination in the main subject. The examination proceeds as follows:
1. defense of the thesis;
2. main subject exam: the discussion of a topic the student draws and then presents without preparation. The topic is from the general subject area approved by the department and specified on the candidate’s thesis title submission form, approved by the head of the department.
(If one of the topics matches the subject of the thesis, that topic is removed from among the list of questions before the candidate draws one).
The main subject areas of the American Studies program are the following: American literature, American history, American culture, and American English and linguistics.
Grades received at the Final Examination:
1. grade received for the defense of the thesis
2. grade received for the discussion of a topic during the main subject exam
Overall result (grade) of the Final Examination:
The final result of the final examination is the mathematical average of the two grades received at the final examination (defense, discussion of a topic). If the candidate fails any of these parts, the relevant regulations of the HKR are to be followed.
Classification of the Diploma:
The degree certificate states the weighted average of the final result of the final examination (A) and the thesis evaluation grade (B) according to the following formula: (A*0,45) + (B*0,55).
Determining the Diploma grade:
According to Section 84 (6) of Academic Regulations, (HKR) the diploma is classified according to its average down to two decimals:
− outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
− excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
− good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
− satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
− pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2.49.
American Studies MA (valid for students admitted in 2017 and thereinafter)_detailed
CENTRAL EUROPEAN STUDIES MA
Excerpt of the requirements:
Central European Studies MA (valid for students admitted in 2021 and thereinafter)_excerpt
Study Programme: Central European Studies (language of instruction: English) Level of education (BA/MA): MA Valid for students admitted in 2021 and thereafter
Components of the Final Examination:
A. Defence of the Thesis
B. Oral exam prescribed by the qualification requirements: The candidate gives account of the most important knowledge covered by the curriculum of the program. The examiners evaluate the examinee’s general knowledge in the main areas covered by the program’s curriculum; they evaluate the examinee’s expertise in the field(s) related to the MA thesis topic; they assess the examinee’s ability to carry out scholarly discourse related to his/her thesis and explain his/her main statements in an apt and convincing way.
Grades received at the Final Examination:
A. grade received for the defence of the Thesis
B. grade received for the oral exam prescribed by the qualification requirements
The examinee’s performance is graded on a five-grade scale (1=fail, 5=excellent).
Overall result (final grade) of the Final Examination:
The mathematical average (rounded to the closest whole number) of the two grades [(A) grade of Thesis defence (B) grade of oral exam prescribed by the qualification requirements] received at the final exam.
In practice= [(A)+(B)]/2
Classification of the Diploma:
The degree certificate states the mathematical average (rounded to two decimals) of the (C) Thesis evaluation grade (written part of Thesis) and the two grades [(A) grade of Thesis defence (B) grade of oral exam prescribed by the qualification requirements] received at the final examination.
In practice: [(A) + (B) + (C)]/3
Determining the Diploma grade:
As described in Section 84. (6), the diploma is classified according to its average down to two decimals:
− outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
− excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
− good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
− satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
− pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2.49.
Central European Studies MA (valid for students admitted in 2021 and thereinafter)_detailed
Study Programme: Central European Studies (language of instruction: English)
Level of education (BA/MA): MA
Valid for students admitted in 2021 and thereafter
MA thesis and final examination requirements
Thesis requirements
Every student studying in the program is required to write a master’s thesis which is worth 20 credits and which meets the requirements listed in the Rules of Study and Examinations (Tanulmányi és vizsgaszabályzat, TVSZ). Students must choose thesis topics related to Central Europe. The thesis is an independent scholarly work of the candidate’s own, conforming to the rules of academic scholarship in terms of referencing, quotations, and the use of literature as well as sources. The thesis must reflect the candidate’s knowledge of sources related to his/her topic; his/her familiarity with the international literature of the given scholarly field; his/her ability to provide a comprehensive summary and critical evaluation of the subject. The thesis must yield novel scholarly results in terms of the exploitation and interpretation of sources and must represent the candidate’s ability to apply the methods of his/her field to his/her own work. All cases where a student is suspected with plagiarism will be brought to the Board of Review.
Formal requirements concerning the thesis:
The length must be minimum 160,000 characters with spaces (28,000 words) including spaces and footnotes, but not counting the table of contents, the bibliography, the illustrations, and the appendix,
at a spacing of 1.5 and in Times New Roman font, size 12. The MA thesis should be submitted electronically in a pdf or Word file. The title page of the thesis must include the name of the author; the author’s Neptun code; the title of the MA thesis in the language of the degree program as well as in Hungarian; the name of the university, the faculty and the program; the name of the thesis adviser; and the year of submission of the thesis.
The student is aided in the preparation of his/her thesis by an advisor who is a lecturer or research fellow with a PhD degree. Every student must choose an adviser and consult him or her at least three times during the preparation of the thesis. If the student fails to do so, the advisor can refuse to give his/her consent to the submission of the thesis, The thesis can only be submitted if the advisor provides a written statement declaring that he/she finds the thesis suitable for submission. The advisor’s written statement must be attached to all submitted copies of the thesis. The thesis must be defended in front of a committee. The defense of the thesis is part of the final examination, which is regulated by the Rules of Study and Examinations (Tanulmányi és vizsgaszabályzat, TVSZ).
Assessment of the thesis:
Assessment is on a five-grade scale. During the evaluation, the assessor must take it into account whether the author has adhered to the prescribed requirements concerning content and form. The factors relevant for grading are scholarly achievement; familiarity with the literature of the field as well as the ability to apply it in a professional manner; structured presentation and apt application of the candidate’s research results; potential topics for further research.
Final Exam requirements
Prerequisites for taking the final examination:
In order to register for the final examination, the student
• must complete all coursework prescribed by the study unit list and obtain all the grades required for the completion of the program;
• must not owe any tuition fees, books etc. to the University;
• must submit his/her thesis by the required deadline and must receive at least a passing grade (2 on a 5-grade scale) on the thesis.
Requirements and evaluation of the final examination:
The final examination is conducted orally and must be taken in front of committee consisting of minimum three lecturers with PhD degrees. The chair of the committee can be a full professor, professor emeritus, or associate professor. Permanent / long-term members of the committee can only be lecturers appointed by the Rector or the Dean. One member of the committee is required to be an external member, i.e. a scholar not employed by the University. The assessor(s) of the thesis must also be invited to the final examination.
The final examination is a combined examination consisting of the defense of the MA thesis and candidate’s giving account of the most important knowledge covered by the curriculum of the program. The examinee’s performance is graded on a five-grade scale (1=fail, 5=excellent). The examiners evaluate the examinee’s general knowledge in the main areas covered by the program’s curriculum; they evaluate the examinee’s expertise in the field(s) related to the MA thesis topic; they assess the examinee’s ability to carry out scholarly discourse related to his/her thesis and explain his/her main statements in an apt and convincing way.
Components of the Final Examination
A. Defence of the Thesis
B. Oral exam prescribed by the qualification requirements: The candidate gives account of the most important knowledge covered by the curriculum of the program. (For the exam question topics. See the section titled ‘Further information’ at the end of this document.) The examiners evaluate the examinee’s general knowledge in the main areas covered by the program’s curriculum; they evaluate the examinee’s expertise in the field(s) related to the MA thesis topic; they assess the examinee’s ability to carry out scholarly discourse related to his/her thesis and explain his/her main statements in an apt and convincing way.
Grades received at the Final Examination
A. grade received for the defence of the Thesis
B. grade received for the oral exam prescribed by the qualification requirements
The examinee’s performance is graded on a five-grade scale (1=fail, 5=excellent).
Overall result (final grade) of the Final Examination
The mathematical average (rounded to the closest whole number) of the two grades [(A) grade of Thesis defence (B) grade of oral exam prescribed by the qualification requirements] received at the final exam.
In practice= [(A)+(B)]/2
Exit-level language requirements:
for the successful completion of master’s program in Central European Studies, it is necessary to demonstrate
• min. C1 level knowledge of English
• and min. B1 level knowledge of one Central European language
Classification of the Diploma:
After successfully completing the final examination and passing the prescribed language examination(s), the University issues a diploma which proves that the student has successfully completed his/her studies. Upon the student’s request, the University issues a Hungarian- language diploma attachment according to the format approved by the European Committee and the European Council.
The degree certificate states the mathematical average (rounded to two decimals) of the (C) Thesis evaluation grade (written part of Thesis) and the two grades [(A) grade of Thesis defence (B) grade of oral exam prescribed by the qualification requirements] received at the final examination.
In practice: [(A) + (B) + (C)]/3
Determining the Diploma grade
As described in Section 84. (6), the diploma is classified according to its average down to two decimals:
− outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
− excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
− good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
− satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
− pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2.49.
Further information:
Exam question topics in the second part of the final exam
One of the topics below will have to be randomly and blindly selected by the student in front of the exam committee. While the first part of the final exam involves the defence of the master’s thesis, the second part involves the elaboration of one exam topic from the list below. After the student’s own summary, the committee may ask further questions related to the selected exam question topic.
1. The emergence and evolution of the concept of Central Europe
2. Political history of Central Europe in the long 19th century (1790-1918)
3. The political system, economy, society and culture in the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy, 1867-1918. The Monarchy’s heritage
4. Political history of Central Europe in the first half of the 20th century (until the end of World War II). Besides a general overview, please present the specifics of one country from the region.
5. Political history of Central Europe from 1945 to 1989. Besides a general overview, please present the specifics of one country from the region.
6. The regime changes of 1989-90 and their consequences. New political systems after 1990
7. National movements in Central Europe in the 19th century. Peoples and languages of the region; the emergence of literary languages, national literary and cultural traditions
8. The situation of minorities in Central European countries in the modern and contemporary periods. (culture, society, legal relations, minority and language policies)
9. Cultural relations and transfers in Central Europe in the 20th and 21st centuries
10. Architecture and urban development in Central Europe in the 19th and 20th centuries
11. Literature and literary trends in Central Europe in the 20th century
12. Societies and societal transformation in Central Europe in the 20th century. Common features and local differences
13. Economic characteristics of Central Europe in the 20th century
14. International relations of Central Europe in the 20th and early 21st century. Central Europe in the globalized world (including the USA and the post-Soviet space)
15. Central Europe and the Euro-Atlantic integration (the European Union and the NATO)
16. Regional relations, conflicts and cooperation in the region from 1990 (Quadragonale, V4, CEFTA, Slavkov Triangle, Three Seas Initiative (Trimarium)
17. History of Hungary from 1919 to 1945 (domestic and foreign policy, economy, society, culture; Hungary in World War II)
18. History of Hungary from 1945 to 1990 (politics, culture, economy, society and the country’s international position in the Cold War era)
COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES MA
Excerpt of the requirements:
Communication and Media Studies MA (valid for students admitted between 2020-2022)_excerpt
Study Programme: Communication and Media Studies (in English)
Level of education (BA/MA): MA
Valid from (for students admitted in): 2020-2022
Components of the Final Examination:
1) defence of the thesis
2) discussion of the topic(s) of the final examination (as set by IAMTS).
Grades received at the Final Examination:
1) grade received for the thesis defence
2) grade received for the topic(s) of the final examination
Overall result (final grade) of the Final Examination:
The final grade of the final examination is the mathematical average of the following two grades: the defence of the thesis and the grade obtained for the topic(s) of the final examination.
Classification of the Diploma:
The degree certificate states the mathematical average (rounded to two decimals) of the following three grades: the grade of the thesis evaluation, the grade of the thesis defence and the grade received for the topic(s) of the final examination.
Determining the Diploma grade:
Section 84. (6) The diploma is classified according to its average down to two decimals:
− outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
− excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
− good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
− satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
− pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2.49.
Communication and Media Studies MA (valid for students admitted in 2023 and thereinafter)_excerpt
Study Programme: Communication and Media Studies (in English)
Level of education (BA/MA): MA
Valid from (for students admitted in): in 2023 and thereafter
Components of the Final Examination:
Assessment is on a five-grade scale. The final exam, which follows the completion of all the units and the submission of the thesis, consists of the thesis defence (the answer to the critique), which includes a review of the professional knowledge related to the thesis topic.
Grades received at the Final Examination:
The grade received for the thesis defence.
Overall result (grade) of the Final Examination:
The grade received for the thesis defence.
Classification of the Diploma:
The diploma grade is awarded on the basis of the arithmetic average of three grades: the grade awarded for the thesis evaluation; the grade awarded for the thesis defence at the final examination; and the grade awarded for the subject “Project work 3.” (BMI-MEDD-143) carried out as part of the programme, rounded to two decimals in accordance with HKR 84§ (6).
Determining the Diploma grade:
As specified in Section 84. (6), the diploma is classified according to its average down to two decimals:
− outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
− excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
− good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
− satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
− pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2.49.
Communication and Media Studies MA (valid for students admitted between 2020-2022)_detailed
Study Programme: Communication and Media Studies (in English)
Level of education (BA/MA): MA
Valid from (for students admitted in): 2020-2022
Components of the Final Examination:
1) defence of the thesis
2) discussion of the topic(s) of the final examination (as set by IAMTS).
Grades received at the Final Examination:
1) grade received for the thesis defence
2) grade received for the topic(s) of the final examination
Overall result (final grade) of the Final Examination:
The final grade of the final examination is the mathematical average of the following two grades: the defence of the thesis and the grade obtained for the topic(s) of the final examination.
Classification of the Diploma:
The degree certificate states the mathematical average (rounded to two decimals) of the following three grades: the grade of the thesis evaluation, the grade of the thesis defence and the grade received for the topic(s) of the final examination.
Determining the Diploma grade:
Section 84. (6) The diploma is classified according to its average down to two decimals:
− outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
− excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
− good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
− satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
− pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2.49.
Communication and Media Studies MA (valid for students admitted in 2023 and thereinafter)_detailed
Study Programme: Communication and Media Studies (in English)
Level of education (BA/MA): MA
Valid from (for students admitted in): in 2023 and thereafter
Components of the Final Examination:
Assessment is on a five-grade scale. The final exam, which follows the completion of all the units and the submission of the thesis, consists of the thesis defence (the answer to the critique), which includes a review of the professional knowledge related to the thesis topic.
Grades received at the Final Examination:
The grade received for the thesis defence.
Overall result (grade) of the Final Examination:
The grade received for the thesis defence.
Classification of the Diploma:
The diploma grade is awarded on the basis of the arithmetic average of three grades: the grade awarded for the thesis evaluation; the grade awarded for the thesis defence at the final examination; and the grade awarded for the subject “Project work 3.” (BMI-MEDD-143) carried out as part of the programme, rounded to two decimals in accordance with HKR 84§ (6).
Determining the Diploma grade:
As specified in Section 84. (6), the diploma is classified according to its average down to two decimals:
− outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
− excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
− good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
− satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
− pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2.49.
CULTURAL HERITAGE STUDIES MA
Excerpt of the requirements:
Cultural Heritage Studies MA (valid for students admitted in 2021 and thereinafter)_excerpt
Study Programme: Cultural Heritage Studies (language of instruction: English) Level of education (BA/MA): MA Valid for students admitted in 2021 and thereafter
Components of the Final Examination:
(i) defence: the defence of the thesis
(ii) topic(s): oral examination based on the topic(s) of the final examination as set by Atelier Department. (The list of topics and the relevant literature will be sent to you by the Department.)
The examiners evaluate the answers of the examinee in scientific/professional areas related to the evaluation of the MA thesis, and also assess the professional background of the examinee along with his/her ability to carry out scientific/professional discourse based on the submitted bibliography of the thesis.
Grades received at the Final Examination:
(i) grade received for the defence
(iii) grade received for the topic(s)
Overall result (final grade) of the Final Examination:
The overall (final) grade of the final examination is calculated on the basis of the defence of the thesis and the grade obtained for the topic(s) of the final examination (as set by Atelier Department).
The grade is determined by the exam committee based on the student's performance during the two parts of the final examination. The committee evaluates the performance during the examination based on the quality of the presentation of the topic.
Classification of the Diploma:
The degree certificate states the mathematical average (rounded to two decimals) of the (iii) thesis evaluation grade (written part of thesis) and the two grades received at the final examination [(i) grade of thesis defence; (ii) grade received for the topic(s) of the final examination].
In practice: [(i) + (ii) + (iii)]/3
Determining the Diploma grade:
As specified in Section 84. (6), the diploma is classified according to its average down to two decimals:
− outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
− excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
− good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
− satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
− pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2.49.
Cultural Heritage Studies MA (valid for students admitted in 2021 and thereinafter)_detailed
Study Programme: Cultural Heritage Studies (language of instruction: English)
Level of education (BA/MA): MA
Valid for students admitted in 2021 and thereafter
MA thesis and final examination requirements
THESIS REQUIREMENTS
The thesis is a piece of independent scientific work of the candidate, the topic of which is determined by the thesis supervisor and the candidate from the field of study taught at the Department. It displays the knowledge of the candidate acquired in the MA Program, the familiarity of the candidate with the literature of the given scientific and/or professional questions, and his/her analytic skills. All students are required to choose a supervisor and consult with them at least three times; failing this, the supervisor may propose the rejection of the thesis. All cases where a student’s work is suspected of plagiarism will be brought to the Board of Review of the Faculty of Humanities.
FORMAL REQUIREMENTS
Length: minimum 150.000 characters (with spaces and notes but not including the cover page, table of contents, bibliography) at 1.5 spacing and 12 pt font in Times New Roman.
The MA thesis (with its attachments) is to be submitted (uploaded) electronically in PDF or WORD format as a single file into the University’s electronic admin system (Neptun).
The title page of the thesis must include the name of the author; the title of the MA thesis in Hungarian, as well as in the language of the degree program; the name of the university, the faculty and the name of the program; the name of the thesis supervisor; and the year of submission of the thesis.
The thesis must be accompanied by a written statement from the student that the work is his/her own intellectual product. The thesis cannot be submitted without the written approval of the supervisor.
ASSESSMENT
The thesis is assessed by two reviewers, who cannot be identical to the supervisors of the thesis. The two reviewers’ assessment results mark of the thesis which is determined by the final
examination committee at the final examination. If one of the assessments is insufficient (a ‘fail’), the thesis will be rejected.
Assessment happens on a five-grade scale. During the evaluation, the referee must take into account whether the author has adhered to the prescribed requirements concerning content and form. The factors relevant for grading are:
• standard literature references with a Bibliography
• a text in English divided into chapters with a table of contents and conclusion (theme choice, research question, method, discussion, result)
• 10-line abstract
• statement about the originality of the submitted work
CONTENT REQUIREMENTS
• relevant topic in cultural heritage studies
• the topic discussion is based on relevant international literature in English
• the discussion is based on original research
• appropriate academic language (in English)
FINAL EXAM REQUIREMENTS
PREREQUISITES FOR THE FINAL EXAMINATION
The prerequisites for the final examination are:
• completion of the study unit list and exams specified in the curriculum for the programme (with the exception of the final examination)
• fulfilment of all training and completion requirements
• returning all property borrowed from the university.
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MA FINAL EXAMINATION
The final examinations are conducted orally, based on the topic(s) of the final examination (as set by Atelier Department).
COMPONENTS OF THE FINAL EAXMINATION
(i) defence: the defence of the thesis
(ii) topic(s): oral examination based on the topic(s) of the final examination as set by Atelier Department. (The list of topics and the relevant literature will be sent to you by the Department.)
EVALUATION AND GRADING OF THE FINAL EXAMINATION
Assessment is on a five-grade scale, based on (i) the defence of the thesis and (ii) the topic(s) of the final examination.
The examiners evaluate the answers of the examinee in scientific/professional areas related to the evaluation of the MA thesis, and also assess the professional background of the examinee
along with his/her ability to carry out scientific/professional discourse based on the submitted bibliography of the thesis.
Grades received at the Final Examination:
(i) grade received for the defence
(iii) grade received for the topic(s)
Overall result (final grade) of the Final Examination:
The overall (final) grade of the final examination is calculated on the basis of the defence of the thesis and the grade obtained for the topic(s) of the final examination (as set by Atelier Department).
The grade is determined by the exam committee based on the student's performance during the two parts of the final examination. The committee evaluates the performance during the examination based on the quality of the presentation of the topic.
DEGREE CERTIFICATE
CLASSIFICATION OF THE DIPLOMA:
The degree certificate states the mathematical average (rounded to two decimals) of the (iii) thesis evaluation grade (written part of thesis) and the two grades received at the final examination [(i) grade of thesis defence; (ii) grade received for the topic(s) of the final examination].
In practice: [(i) + (ii) + (iii)]/3
DETERMINING THE DIPLOMA GRADE:
According to Section 84 (6) of Academic Regulations, (HKR) the degree (diploma) is classified (graded) according to its average down to two decimals:
− outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
− excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
− good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
− satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
− pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2.49.
DUTCH LANGUAGE AND CULTURE STUDIES MA
Excerpt of the requirements:
Dutch Language and Culture Studies MA (valid for students admitted in 2017 and thereinafter)_excerpt
Study Programme: Dutch Language and Culture Studies (language of instruction: Dutch) Level of education (BA/MA): MA Valid for students admitted in 2017 and thereafter
Components of the Final Examination
The final examination consists of two components:
1. Thesis Presentation (Thesis Defence) The candidate presents the main questions, methodology and findings of their thesis using a digital presentation tool such as PowerPoint or Prezi. As part of the presentation the candidate must also address the comments and questions raised in the referee’s report.
The presentation must not exceed 15 minutes in duration.
2. Subject-Specific Examination (Main Subject Examination)
The candidate demonstrates their academic knowledge in the disciplinary area of their thesis (i.e. literature or linguistics).
The examination topics comprise 10 topics in linguistics and 10 in literature.
The candidate draws one topic from the field of their thesis (literature or linguistics), and discusses its main aspects. During the examination, the committee may narrow the scope of the question or pose follow-up questions, including questions related to other topics.
Grades awarded at the Final Examination
1. Grade for the presentation and defence of the thesis
2. Grade for the subject-specific examination
Final result (overall grade) of the Final Examination
The overall grade of the final examination is calculated as the arithmetic average of the two component grades (thesis defence + subject-specific examination), rounded to the nearest whole number according to the rules of academic rounding.
If the candidate fails either component, the relevant provisions of the Academic Regulations for Students (HKR) shall apply.
Formula:
Final grade = (grade for thesis defence + grade for the subject-specific examination) / 2
Classification of the Diploma
The final grade of the diploma is determined by the following three components (marks):
A = grade awarded for the thesis
A = grade awarded for the thesis defence during the Final Examination
C = grade awarded for subject-specific examination during the Final Examination
Formula
Final grade of the diploma = (A + B + C) / 3
Determining the Diploma grade
According to Section 84 (6) of Academic Regulations for Students (HKR), the diploma grade is classified based on the final average (rounded to two decimal places) as follows:
− outstanding (5): 4.80–5.00
− excellent (5): 4.50–4.79
− good (4): 3.50–4.49
− satisfactory (3): 2.50–3.49
pass (2): 2.00–2.49
Dutch Language and Culture Studies MA (valid for students admitted in 2017 and thereinafter)_detailed
Study Programme: Dutch Language and Culture Studies (language of instruction: Dutch)
Level of education (BA/MA): MA
Valid for students admitted in 2017 and thereafter
Graduation and Thesis requirements
Thesis requirements
− As of the academic year 2020/21, all theses must be submitted electronically, via Neptun. The thesis must be prepared and uploaded in an electronic format (PDF, Word or zip). Please note that only one file (including all attachments) may be uploaded to Neptun. − Candidates must ensure compliance with the university's regulations regarding plagiarism-checking.
− As of September 2021, supervisor approval is required for thesis admission across all study programmes. To request approval, please select ‘Thesis admission request’ in Neptun (Studies > Degree Thesis/Thesis application).
Final Examination Requirements
The aim of the final examination is to assess whether the candidate has acquired, and is able to apply the knowledge, skills, and competences required for the Master’s (MA) degree.
The final examination is conducted before an academic committee, and the student is assessed on a scale of 1 to 5. The candidate must demonstrate a sound knowledge and solid understanding of the relevant fields (Dutch literature, history, culture, and linguistics), and must articulate this knowledge in high-quality Dutch.
The final examination consists of two components:
1. Thesis Presentation (Thesis Defence)
The candidate presents the main questions, methodology and findings of their thesis using a digital presentation tool such as PowerPoint or Prezi. As part of the presentation the candidate must also address the comments and questions raised in the referee’s report.
The presentation must not exceed 15 minutes in duration.
The committee assesses whether the thesis represents the candidate’s own independent work, and whether the candidate is able to effectively communicate and reflect on their main findings. The presentation thus serves not only as a summary of the thesis but also as evidence of authorship and academic competence. The presentation is evaluated according to 5 criteria: content, structure, language use, presentation technique and response to the referee’s report.
2. Subject-Specific Examination (Main Subject Examination)
The candidate demonstrates their academic knowledge in the disciplinary area of their thesis (i.e. literature or linguistics).
The examination topics comprise 10 topics* in linguistics and 10 in literature.
The candidate draws one topic from the field of their thesis (literature or linguistics), and discusses its main aspects. During the examination, the committee may narrow the scope of the question or pose follow-up questions, including questions related to other topics.
The final grade for the final examination is the arithmetic average of the two marks awarded (thesis defence, and subject-specific examination). If the candidate fails either component, the relevant regulations of the Academic Regulations for Students (HKR) shall apply.
*Final Examination Topics: Find the list HERE.
Prerequisites for the Final Examination
1. Final Certificate (“abszolutórium”)
The candidate must hold a final certificate (“abszolutórium” in Hungarian) confirming that all required coursework and academic obligations – with the exception of the final examination – have been completed, as specified in the Study Unit List. It also certifies that all credit points required by qualification framework have been earned. The final certificate is issued in the semester in which all these requirements are fulfilled.
2. No Outstanding Financial or Administrative Obligations
The candidate must have settled all financial obligations (e.g. tuition fees or other outstanding payments) and must have returned all university property.
3. Thesis Submission and Assessment
The candidate must have submitted their thesis by the required deadline and received a passing grade.
Important Note: ALL prerequisites must be fulfilled at least 3 days prior to the final examination. No examination may be scheduled after the final examination.
REGISTERING FOR THE FINAL EXAMINATION
The candidate must register for the Final Examination through Neptun in the semester in which they intend to take it.
GRADES AWARDED AT THE FINAL EXAMINATION
1. Grade for the presentation and defence of the thesis
2. Grade for the subject-specific examination
FINAL RESULT (OVERALL GRADE) OF THE FINAL EXAMINATION
The overall grade of the final examination is calculated as the arithmetic average of the two component grades (thesis defence + subject-specific examination), rounded to the nearest whole number according to the rules of academic rounding. If the candidate fails either component, the relevant provisions of the Academic Regulations for Students (HKR) shall apply.
Formula: Final grade = (grade for thesis defence + grade for the subject-specific examination) / 2
CLASSIFICATION OF THE DIPLOMA
The final grade of the diploma is determined by the following three components (marks):
A = grade awarded for the thesis
A = grade awarded for the thesis defence during the Final Examination
C = grade awarded for subject-specific examination during the Final Examination
Formula
Final grade of the diploma = (A + B + C) / 3
DETERMINING THE DIPLOMA GRADE
According to Section 84 (6) of Academic Regulations for Students (HKR), the diploma grade is classified based on the final average (rounded to two decimal places) as follows:
− outstanding (5): 4.80–5.00
− excellent (5): 4.50–4.79
− good (4): 3.50–4.49
− satisfactory (3): 2.50–3.49
− pass (2): 2.00–2.49
ENGLISH STUDIES MA
Excerpt of the requirements:
English Studies MA (valid for students admitted in 2017 and thereinafter)_excerpt
Study Programme: English Studies (language of instruction: English) Level of education (BA/MA): MA Valid for students admitted in 2017 and thereafter
Components of the Final Examination:
The final examination consists of two parts: the defence of the thesis and the main subject exam. The examination proceeds as follows:
1. defence of the thesis;
2. main subject exam: the discussion of a topic the student draws and then presents without preparation. The topic is from the general subject area approved by the department and specified on the candidate’s thesis title submission form, approved by the head of the department.
Grades received at the Final Examination:
1. grade received for the defence of the thesis
2. grade received for the discussion of a topic during the main subject exam
Overall result (grade) of the Final Examination:
The final result of the final examination is the mathematical average of the two grades received at the final examination (defence, discussion of a topic). If the candidate fails any of these parts, the relevant regulations of the HKR are to be followed.
Classification of the Diploma:
The degree certificate states the weighted average of the final result of the final examination (A) and the thesis evaluation grade (B) according to the following formula: (A*0,45) + (B*0,55).
Determining the Diploma grade:
According to Section 84 (6) of Academic Regulations, (HKR) the diploma is classified according to its average down to two decimals:
− outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
− excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
− good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
− satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
− pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2.49.
English Studies MA (valid for students admitted in 2017 and thereinafter)_detailed
ENGLISH AND AMERICAN STUDIES BA
Excerpt of the requirements:
English and American Studies BA (valid for students admitted in 2021 and thereinafter)_excerpt
Level of education (BA/MA): BA
Valid for students admitted in 2021 and thereafter
Components of the Final Examination:
The Final Examination consists of three parts typically in this order:
defence of the thesis;
elaboration of a question covering one aspect of the main topic; and
elaboration of a question covering one aspect of the subsidiary topic
Grades received at the Final Examination:
grade received for the defence of the thesis: The defence is based on the questions and
remarks of the Referee.
grade received for the main topic: The 12 questions come from the subject areas taught at BA
level in the English and American specialisations (tracks).
grade received for the subsidiary topic: Similarly to the main topic, the 12 questions come
from the subject areas taught at BA level in the English and American specialisations (tracks).
grade received for language proficiency: The Committee ascertains how adept the Student is
at forming opinions on academic matters in fluent, stylistically appropriate and adequate English
in a formal environment. The grade is awarded by the Head of Committee on the
recommendations of the members of the Committee.
If any of the grades is insufficient (a fail, ‘1’), the Final Examination will be declared as failed. The failed
component(s) of the Final Examination may be attempted the following semester at the earliest.
Overall result (final grade) of the Final Examination:
The final result of the final examination is the mathematical average of the following five grades rounded
to the closest whole number:
thesis evaluation grade
thesis defence grade
grade received for the main topic
grade received for the subsidiary topic
grade received for language proficiency
Classification of the Diploma:
The Degree Certificate states the scale of achievement attained at the Final Examination. The average is
calculated on the basis of the following 5 grades, rounded to two decimals:
thesis evaluation grade
thesis defence grade
grade received for the main topic
grade received for the subsidiary topic
grade received for language proficiency
Determining the Diploma grade:
Section 84. (6) The diploma is classified according to its average down to two decimals:
1056 Budapest, Szerb utca 21-23. fszt. 1.,4.,5. • kommunikacio@elte.hu • www.elte.hu
− outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
− excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
− good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
− satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
− pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2.49
English and American Studies BA (valid for students admitted in 2021 and thereinafter) _detailed
FILM STUDIES MA
Film Studies Thesis Requirements Final Exam information
Excerpt of the requirements:
Film Studies MA (valid for students admitted between 2017-2023)_excerpt
Study Programme: Film Studies (language of instruction: English) Level of education (BA/MA): MA Valid for students admitted in: 2017-2023
Components of the Final Examination:
· For students of the Film Theory Specialization:
o The final examination consists of the defence of the MA thesis (one component). Students must prove that they are fluent in film historical and theoretical questions relevant for their thesis topic, and they must also show that they are capable of explaining the thesis in conversation in a nuanced and precise manner.
· For Students of the Filmmaking Specialization:
o The Final Examination includes the detailed discussion of the portfolio. The exam consists of three components:
(1) the discussion of the creative film/video or other screen media products, and
(2) the discussion of the working diary, and
(3) the discussion of the academic component of the thesis project.
Grades given/received at the Final Examination:
Assessment is on a five-grade scale. The examiners evaluate the expertise of the examinee in scientific/artistic areas related to the MA thesis topic, and also assess the professional background of the examinee along with his/her ability to carry out scientific/artistic discourse.
Students of the Film Theory Specialisation receive one grade for the defence of the thesis.
Students of the Filmmaking Specialisation receive three grades for the three components:
(1) grade received for the detailed discussion of the creative film/video or other screen media products,
(2) grade received for the detailed discussion of the working diary
(3) grade received for the detailed discussion of academic component of the thesis project.)
Overall result (final grade) of the Final Examination:
In the Film Theory Specialisation, the overall grade of the Final Examination is the grade received for the defence of the thesis (one component).
In the Filmmaking Specialization, the overall grade of the Final Examination is calculated as the mathematical average of the three grades received for the above-mentioned three components.
Classification of the Diploma:
The degree certificate grade is the mathematical average of the grade of the (1) thesis and the (2) final grade received at the Final Examination, rounded to two decimals.
Determining the Diploma grade:
Section 84. (6) The diploma is classified according to its average down to two decimals:
− outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
− excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
− good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
− satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
− pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2. 49.
Film Studies MA (valid for students admitted in 2024 and thereinafter)_excerpt
Study Programme: Film Studies (language of instruction: English) Level of education (BA/MA): MA Valid for students admitted in: 2024 and thereafter
Components of the Final Examination:
· For students of the Film Theory Specialization:
o The final examination consists of the defence of the MA thesis (one component). Students must prove that they are fluent in film historical and theoretical questions relevant for their thesis topic, and they must also show that they are capable of explaining the thesis in conversation in a nuanced and precise manner.
· For Students of the Filmmaking Specialization:
o The Final Examination includes the detailed discussion of the portfolio. The exam consists of three components:
(1) the discussion of the creative film/video or other screen media products, and
(2) the discussion of the working diary
(3) the discussion of the academic component of the thesis project.
Grades received at the Final Examination:
Assessment is on a five-grade scale. The examiners evaluate the expertise of the examinee in scientific/artistic areas related to the MA thesis topic, and also assess the professional background of the examinee along with his/her ability to carry out scientific/artistic discourse.
Students of the Film Theory Specialisation receive one grade for the defence of the thesis.
Students of the Filmmaking Specialisation receive three grades for the three components:
(1) grade received for the detailed discussion of the creative film/video or other screen media products,
(2) grade received for the detailed discussion of the working diary
(3) grade received for the detailed discussion of academic component of the thesis project.
Overall result (final grade) of the Final Examination:
In the Film Theory Specialisation, the overall grade of the Final Examination is the grade received for the defence of the thesis (one component).
In the Filmmaking Specialization, the overall grade of the Final Examination is calculated as the mathematical average of the three grades received for the above-mentioned three components.
Classification of the Diploma:
The degree certificate is calculated according to the following formula: grade of the thesis (65%) and the final grade received at the final examination (35%).
Determining the Diploma grade:
Section 84. (6) The diploma is classified according to its average down to two decimals:
− outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
− excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
− good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
− satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
− pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2. 49.
Film Studies MA (valid for students admitted between 2017-2023)_detailed
Study Programme: Film Studies (language of instruction: English)
Level of education (BA/MA): MA
Valid for students admitted in: 2017-2023
MA thesis and final examination requirements
MA thesis requirements for film theory specialization:
The thesis is the independent scientific work of the candidate, the topic of which is determined by the thesis adviser and the candidate from the field of study taught at the Department. It displays the knowledge of the candidate acquired in the MA Program, the literacy of the candidate in the international literature of the given scientific question, and the analytic skills of the candidate in the interpretation of screen media products. All cases where a student is suspected with plagiarism will be brought to the Board of Review.
Formal requirements:
Length: minimum 70.000 characters, maximum 140.000 characters without spaces (12.000- 24.000 words) at a spacing of 1.5 and font size 12. MA theses should be submitted electronically
through Neptun. The title page of the thesis must include the name of the author; the title of the MA thesis in Hungarian as well as in the language of the degree program; the name of the university, the faculty as well as the name of the program; the name of the thesis adviser; and the year of submission of the thesis.
Assessment:
Assessment is on a five-grade scale. During the evaluation, the referee must take into account whether the author has adhered to the prescribed requirements concerning content and form. The factors relevant for grading are: scientific achievement, familiarity with the literature as well as the ability to apply it in a professional manner, structured presentation and apt application of the results, potential topics for further research.
MA thesis requirements for filmmaking specialization:
The thesis project in the Filmmaking Specialization has to be submitted as a portfolio. The details and the format of the portfolio are to be determined in close collaboration with the adviser, but in all cases has to include:
(1) creative film/video or other screen media project,
(2) theoretical/historical description of the background of the chosen theme (the length of the theoretical/historical essay is between 20.000-30.000 characters without space - 3.500-5.000 words)
(3) description of the phases of the work, i.e. a diary of the creative process. The length of the working diary is minimum 15.000 characters without space (3.000 words).
All written parts of the MA theses in filmmaking specialization should be submitted electronically through Neptun. For the submission of the creative media project see the special instructions of the
department. The title page of the thesis must include the name of the author; the title of the MA thesis in Hungarian as well as in the language of the degree program; the name of the university, the faculty as well as the name of the program; the name of the thesis adviser; and the year of submission of the thesis.
The overall grade of the thesis is the mathematical average of the three grades received for each of the above components.
Requirements for the MA final examination:
The final examinations are conducted orally.
Prerequisites for the final examination:
The prerequisites for the final examination are:
• the completion of the study unit list and exams specified in the curriculum for the program (with the exception the final examination)
• the fulfillment of all training and completion requirements
• Thesis submitted by the deadline, marked with a pass grade
• returning all property borrowed from the university (book/overdue fine to the library, items to the Film Studio)
Components of the Final Examination:
For students of the Film Theory Specialization:
The final examination consists of the defence of the MA thesis (one component). Students must prove that they are fluent in film historical and theoretical questions relevant for their thesis topic, and they must also show that they are capable of explaining the thesis in conversation in a nuanced and precise manner.
The final examination includes a combined examination of film history and film theory and the defense of the MA thesis. Students must prove that they have mastered the training requirements as well as the most important knowledge prescribed in the curriculum, and they must also show that they are capable of explaining the thesis in conversation in a nuanced and precise manner.
For Students of the Filmmaking Specialization:
The Final Examination includes the detailed discussion of the portfolio. The exam consists of three components:
(1) the discussion of the creative film/video or other screen media products, and
(2) the discussion of the working diary, and
(3) the discussion of the academic component (written contextual part) of the thesis project.
Grades given/received at the Final Examination:
Assessment is on a five-grade scale. The examiners evaluate the expertise of the examinee in scientific/artistic areas related to the MA thesis topic and also assess the professional background of the examinee along with his/her ability to carry out scientific/artistic discourse.
Students of the Film Theory Specialisation receive one grade for the defence of the thesis.
Students of the Filmmaking Specialisation receive three grades for the three components:
(1) grade received for the detailed discussion of the creative film/video or other screen media products,
(2) grade received for the detailed discussion of the working diary
(3) grade received for the detailed discussion of academic component (written contextual part) of the thesis project.
Overall result (final grade) of the Final Examination:
In the Film Theory Specialisation, the overall grade of the Final Examination is the grade received for the defence of the thesis (one component).
In the Filmmaking Specialization, the overall grade of the Final Examination is calculated as the mathematical average of the three grades received for the above-mentioned three components
Classification of the Diploma:
The degree certificate grade is the mathematical average of the grade of the (1) thesis and the (2) final grade received at the Final Examination, rounded to two decimals.
Determining the Diploma grade:
Section 84. (6) The diploma is classified according to its average down to two decimals:
− outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
− excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
− good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
− satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
− pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2. 49.
Film Studies MA (valid for students admitted in 2024 and thereinafter)_ detailed
Study Programme: Film Studies (language of instruction: English)
Level of education (BA/MA): MA
Valid for students admitted in: 2024 and thereafter
MA thesis and final examination requirements
MA thesis requirements for film theory specialization:
The thesis is the independent scientific work of the candidate, the topic of which is determined by the thesis adviser and the candidate from the field of study taught at the Department. It displays the knowledge of the candidate acquired in the MA Program, the literacy of the candidate in the international literature of the given scientific question, and the analytic skills of the candidate in the interpretation of screen media products. All cases where a student is suspected with plagiarism will be brought to the Board of Review.
Formal requirements:
Length: minimum 70.000 characters, maximum 140.000 characters without spaces (12.000- 24.000 words) at a spacing of 1.5 and font size 12. MA theses should be submitted electronically
through Neptun. The title page of the thesis must include the name of the author; the title of the MA thesis in Hungarian as well as in the language of the degree program; the name of the university, the faculty as well as the name of the program; the name of the thesis adviser; and the year of submission of the thesis.
Assessment:
Assessment is on a five-grade scale. During the evaluation, the referee must take into account whether the author has adhered to the prescribed requirements concerning content and form. The factors relevant for grading are: scientific achievement, familiarity with the literature as well as the ability to apply it in a professional manner, structured presentation and apt application of the results, potential topics for further research.
MA thesis requirements for filmmaking specialization:
The thesis project in the Filmmaking Specialization has to be submitted as a portfolio. The details and the format of the portfolio are to be determined in close collaboration with the adviser, but in all cases has to include:
(1) creative film/video or other screen media project,
(2) theoretical/historical description of the background of the chosen theme (the length of the theoretical/historical essay is between 20.000-30.000 characters without space - 3.500-5.000 words)
(3) description of the phases of the work, i.e. a diary of the creative process. The length of the working diary is minimum 15.000 characters without space (3.000 words).
All written parts of the MA theses in filmmaking specialization should be submitted electronically through Neptun. For the submission of the creative media project see the special instructions of the
department. The title page of the thesis must include the name of the author; the title of the MA thesis in Hungarian as well as in the language of the degree program; the name of the university, the faculty as well as the name of the program; the name of the thesis adviser; and the year of submission of the thesis.
The overall grade of the thesis is the mathematical average of the three grades received for each of the above components.
Requirements for the MA final examination:
The final examinations are conducted orally.
Prerequisites for the final examination:
The prerequisites for the final examination are:
• the completion of the study unit list and exams specified in the curriculum for the program (with the exception the final examination)
• the fulfillment of all training and completion requirements
• Thesis submitted by the deadline, marked with a pass grade
• returning all property borrowed from the university (book/overdue fine to the library, items to the Film Studio)
Components of the Final Examination:
For students of the Film Theory Specialization:
The final examination consists of the defence of the MA thesis (one component). Students must prove that they are fluent in film historical and theoretical questions relevant for their thesis topic, and they must also show that they are capable of explaining the thesis in conversation in a nuanced and precise manner.
The final examination includes a combined examination of film history and film theory and the defense of the MA thesis. Students must prove that they have mastered the training requirements as well as the most important knowledge prescribed in the curriculum, and they must also show that they are capable of explaining the thesis in conversation in a nuanced and precise manner.
For Students of the Filmmaking Specialization:
The Final Examination includes the detailed discussion of the portfolio. The exam consists of three components:
(1) the discussion of the creative film/video or other screen media products, and
(2) the discussion of the working diary, and
(3) the discussion of the academic component (written contextual part) of the thesis project.
Grades given/received at the Final Examination:
Assessment is on a five-grade scale. The examiners evaluate the expertise of the examinee in scientific/artistic areas related to the MA thesis topic and also assess the professional background of the examinee along with his/her ability to carry out scientific/artistic discourse.
Students of the Film Theory Specialisation receive one grade for the defence of the thesis.
Students of the Filmmaking Specialisation receive three grades for the three components:
(1) grade received for the detailed discussion of the creative film/video or other screen media products,
(2) grade received for the detailed discussion of the working diary
(3) grade received for the detailed discussion of academic component (written contextual part) of the thesis project.
Overall result (final grade) of the Final Examination:
In the Film Theory Specialisation, the overall grade of the Final Examination is the grade received for the defence of the thesis (one component).
In the Filmmaking Specialization, the overall grade of the Final Examination is calculated as the mathematical average of the three grades received for the above-mentioned three components
Classification of the Diploma:
The degree certificate is calculated according to the following formula: grade of the thesis (65%) and the final grade received at the final examination (35%).
Determining the Diploma grade:
Section 84. (6) The diploma is classified according to its average down to two decimals:
− outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
− excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
− good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
− satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
− pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2. 49.
FRENCH LANGUAGE, LITERATURE AND CULTURE MA FRENCH LANGUAGE, LITERATURE AND CULTURE MA
Excerpt of the requirements:
French Language, Literature and Culture MA (valid for students admitted in 2022 and thereinafter)_excerpt
Study Programme: French Language, Literature and Culture (language of instruction: French) Level of education (BA/MA): MA Valid for students admitted in 2022 and thereafter
Components of the Final Examination:
1) Presentation of the Thesis
2) Defence of the Thesis
3) Oral examination related to the thesis topic
Grades received at the Final Examination:
1) Grade received for the presentation of the Thesis
2) Grade received for the defence of the Thesis
3) Grade received for the oral examination related to the thesis topic
Overall result (final grade) of the Final Examination:
The mathematical average of the three grades, rounded to the closest whole number: (1) grade of Thesis presentation, 2) grade of Thesis defence and 3) grade of oral exam related to Thesis) received at the final exam.
Classification of the Diploma:
The degree certificate states the mathematical average of the Thesis evaluation grade (written part of Thesis) (A) and the final grade received at the final examination (B).
In practice: [(A)+(B)]/2
Determining the Diploma grade:
Section 84. (6) The diploma is classified according to its average down to two decimals:
− outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
− excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
− good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
− satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
− pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2.49.
French Language, Literature and Culture MA (valid for students admitted in 2022 and thereinafter)_detailed
Exigences linguistiques :
La langue de formation est le français. L’admission en master est conditionnée à l’obtention d’un examen national de langue française (type C1), ou d’un diplôme équivalent.
EXIGENCES LIÉES AU MÉMOIRE ET À LA SOUTENANCE :
Mémoire :
Exigences formelles :
- Le mémoire doit être déposé sous format électronique et doit compter au minimum 75 000 caractères, lesquels représentent uniquement le corps effectif du mémoire, autrement dit sans la page de titre, ni la table des matières, ni la bibliographie, etc.
- Le mémoire est écrit dans la langue de la spécialisation.
L’étudiant doit attester que le mémoire rendu est le fruit de son propre travail. En inscrivant son nom sur le mémoire, l’étudiant déclare être à l'origine de ce travail. Il reconnaît que l'utilisation indue (sans guillemets ni citation précise des sources, avec nom d'auteur, date, numéro de page) du travail d'autrui, sera qualifiée de plagiat, et le mémoire sera pénalisé par une note éliminatoire. L’utilisation de l’intelligence artificielle doit être documentée.
ATTESTATION DE L’ÉTUDIANT Je soussigné(e) (nom, prénom, code Neptune) déclare et atteste que le présent mémoire présenté au Master de langue, littérature et culture françaises de la Faculté des Lettres de l’Université ELTE est le fruit de mon propre travail, dans lequel je n’ai pas intégré le travail d’autrui (livre, étude, manuscrit, source internet, citations personnelles) sans guillemets ni références précises. À Budapest, le signature de l’étudiant |
L'étudiant ne peut déposer son mémoire qu'avec l'autorisation manuscrite de son directeur. Le directeur déclare sur la page de titre interne qu’il autorise le dépôt du travail.
DÉCLARATION DU DIRECTEUR DE MÉMOIRE Je soussigné(e) (nom, prénom) déclare et atteste que X.Y. (code Neptune), étudiant du Master de langue, littérature et culture françaises de la Faculté des Lettres de l’Université ELTE, peut déposer son mémoire. À Budapest, le signature |
Exigences de contenu :
- Le thème du mémoire doit être choisi parmi les domaines enseignés dans le cadre de la spécialisation.
- Dans leur mémoire, les étudiants doivent faire preuve d’un esprit de synthèse, appliquer les démarches nécessaires à tout travail scientifique et utiliser à un haut niveau les procédés stylistiques et méthodiques souhaités dans un travail rédigé dans la langue choisie.
- En fonction de son caractère, le thème du mémoire peut être théorique ou pratique - là ou l’expérimentation et l’observation sont possibles (par exemple en linguistique et en linguistique appliquée).
- Il est souhaitable que le mémoire s’appuie sur une bibliographie récente (et, si nécessaire, ancienne du thème).
Évaluation :
Sur une échelle de 5 (de 1 à 5).
Exigences concernant la fin du MA :
Conditions d’admission à la soutenance de MA : présentation du certificat de fin d’études et du mémoire de master accepté. La soutenance a lieu à la fin du 4e semestre (ou à la fin du semestre terminant les études).
Pendant la soutenance, les étudiants doivent montrer qu’ils ont acquis les connaissances les plus importantes prescrites par le plan de formation (à cette fin, le département peut préparer une liste des renvois bibliographiques). Dans la mesure où le département n’impose pas d’examen final de langue, il peut dans le cadre de la soutenance s'assurer que l’aptitude à l’oral des étudiants correspond aux exigences liées à un examen supérieur de langue de type C1. Relèvent des connaissances contrôlées lors de l’examen oral, les thèmes de la spécialité présentés dans le mémoire.
La soutenance est composée des parties suivantes :
1) Présentation du mémoire (10 minutes maximum) : l’étudiant expose, à l'aide d'un support PowerPoint, l’importance du thème traité par le mémoire, l’arrière-plan scientifique, la méthode de recherche employée, les résultats les plus importants.
2) Soutenance du mémoire : l'étudiant répond aux questions qui lui ont été posées par le rapporteur du mémoire dans un rapport écrit ; les membres du jury peuvent également poser des questions.
3) Questions liées au thème du mémoire : afin de déterminer plus précisément la thématique, l’étudiant qui se présente à la soutenance doit, en accord avec son directeur de mémoire, indiquer les thèmes (littérature spécialisée, sources) à partir desquels il se préparera. L’étudiant doit faire accepter cette liste par le professeur rapporteur.
Évaluation de la soutenance :
Le jury de soutenance évalue séparément sur une échelle de cinq les trois parties de l’examen ; la note finale de la soutenance est obtenue par la moyenne de ces notes.
CONDITIONS D’ADMISSION À LA SOUTENANCE :
L’admission à la soutenance est soumise aux conditions suivantes : réussite aux modules énumérés ci-dessous et attestation de retour des biens prêtés par l’établissement.
MENTION DU DIPLÔME :
La mention du diplôme est obtenue par la moyenne - arrondie à un chiffre entier - des notes acquises à la soutenance et pour le mémoire.
RESPONSABLE DE LA FORMATION :
Dr. Krisztina Horváth, maître de conférences HDR
GERMANIC STUDIES (GERMAN) BA
GERMANIC STUDIES, SPECIALIZED IN GERMAN STUDIES BA
Excerpt of the requirements:
Germanic Studies (German) BA (valid for students admitted in 2020 and thereinafter)_excerpt
Germanic Studies (German) BA (valid for students admitted in 2020 and thereinafter)_detailed
HUNGARIAN BA
Excerpt of the requirements:
Hungarian BA (valid for students admitted in 2017 and thereinafter)_excerpt
Study Programme: Hungarian (language of instruction: English) Level of education (BA/MA): BA Valid from (for students admitted in): students admitted in 2017 and after |
Components of the Final Examination:
The final exam consists of two parts: the defense of the Thesis and a complex exam based on a fixed list of topics. The list consists of 12 literary and 12 linguistic topics.
- Parts of the defense: response to the written evaluation of the thesis and response to the questions put by the committee.
- At the complex exam, the student gets one topic from literature and one from linguistics.
Grades received at the Final Examination:
- grade received for the defense of the Thesis
- grade received for the answers on the two topics at the complex exam (literature and linguistics)
Overall result (final grade) of the Final Examination:
Evaluation of the final exam: average of the grade received for the defense of the Thesis (1.) and the grade received for the answers on the two topics at the complex exam (2.)
Rounding is done towards the complex exam result.
If one of the grades received for the answers on the two topics is a 1 (fail) the whole exam component (2.) must be awarded with a 1 (fail).
Classification of the Diploma:
The result that appears on your degree certificate is the mathematical means of the following 3 grades:
- three times the weighted average score of the grades of all Hungarian introductory and core subjects (MIR and MNY) according to the following formula:
([(grade1 for subject1 × the number of credits it carries) + (grade2 for subject2 × the number of credits it carries) + … + (grade35 for subject35 × the number of credits it carries) / 108 (= the number of credits the 35 subjects carry)
- the grade for your degree thesis evaluation once
- the grade for the final examination once
Determining the Diploma grade:
As specified in Section 84. (6), the diploma is classified according to its average down to two decimals:
- outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
- excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
- good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
- satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
- pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2.49.
English and American Studies BA (valid for students admitted in 2021 and thereinafter) _detailed
REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPLETION
BACHELOR’S DEGREE (B.A.) IN HUNGARIAN
MAJOR
INSTITUTIONS OFFERING THE MAJOR
Hungarian Institute of Linguistics and Finno-Ugric Studies and Hungarian Institute of Literary and Cultural Studies
REQUIREMENTS OF THE THESIS AND THE FINAL EXAMINATION
Formal requirements:
- The Thesis has to be submitted electronically, via Neptun. The Thesis needs to be prepared and uploaded in an electronic format (PDF, Word or zip). You can upload only 1 document/file to Neptun (including all attachments).
- The institutes publish the rules of formatting references, bibliography, and notes on their websites. The templates for the required layout and the standard textual elements to be applied (as in the case of the exterior cover and the plagiarism declaration) are available at the relevant section of the faculty website.
- The cover should include the word “Thesis”, the title and year of the thesis, the name and title of the supervisor in the lower left corner, and the name, degree and year of the thesis in the lower right corner.
- While uploading it, the student needs to declare in Neptun that the Thesis is their own intellectual product.
- Please, take the university's regulations regarding plagiarism-checking into consideration.
- Thesis length: approx. 30 numbered pages of text without title page, table of contents, appendices and bibliography (approx. 60,000 characters without spaces), font size: Times New Roman 12, line spacing: 1/2-inch margins, single-sided.
- The language of the thesis is Hungarian.
Content requirements:
- The student typically chooses a thesis topic from the list of topics provided by the institutes or the lecturers but may also choose other topics with the consent of the relevant department head.
- The thesis may be a seminar paper written in the course of a three-year course or an advanced version of it provided that it meets the content and form requirements of a thesis.
- The student must choose a supervisor. The supervisor must be an instructor of the Institute with professional qualification. The instructor might be approved as a supervisor by the head of the relevant department. Only in exceptional cases (if the subject does not have an expert in the Institute), with the consent of the director of the institute, may a non-affiliated professional act as a supervisor. The student must have the thesis title application signed by the supervisor, the head of department or the director of the institute before submitting.
- From September 2021, the supervisor’s consent is needed for uploading the Thesis on all study programmes. For the approval, click on the button ‘Thesis admission request’ (in Neptun under Studies > Degree Thesis/Thesis application).
Evaluation:
On a five-point scale (1-5).
Major completion requirements:
The final exam consists of two parts: the defense of the dissertation and a complex final exam based on a fixed list of topics. The list consists of 12 literary and 12 linguistic topics.
- Parts of the defense: response to the written evaluation of the thesis and response to the questions put by the committee.
- At the final exam, the student gets one topic from literature and one from linguistics.
Evaluation of the final exam:
Average grade of thesis defense and oral examination (based on the topics listed below).
QUALIFICATION OF THE CERTIFICATE
The diploma is awarded by the arithmetic mean of the following three partial scores:
- three times the weighted average score of all Hungarian introductory and core subjects from the curriculum;
- the result of the degree thesis once;
- the result of the final examination once.
According to Section 84 (6) of Academic Regulations, (HKR) the diploma is classified according to its average down to two decimals:
- outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
- excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
- good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
- satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
- pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2.49.
TOPICS FOR ORAL EXAMINATION:
Hungarian linguistics
- The process of communication
(the notion of communication and its descriptive models, types of communication) A kommunikáció folyamata (a kommunikáció fogalma; a kommunikáció típusai) Recommended reading:
Fercsik Erzsébet–Raátz Judit 2003. Kommunikáció szóban és írásban. Krónika Nova Kiadó, Budapest. 14–20, 115–125.
Terestyéni Tamás 2006. Kommunikációelmélet. A testbeszédtől az internetig. AKTITypotex, Budapest. 37–53.
- Rhetoric devices of persuasion
(the sources of persuasion: the speaker, the speech, the audience; rhetoric structure of the speech; the role of nonverbal signs in persuasion)
A meggyőzés retorikai eszközei (a meggyőzés forrásai: a beszélő, a beszéd, a hallgatóság; a beszéd retorikai szerkezete; a nem nyelvi jelek szerepe a meggyőzésben)
Recommended reading:
Antalné Szabó Ágnes 2003. A meggyőzés forrásai. In: Róka Jolán szerk., Szónoklatok nagykönyve iskolaigazgatóknak. Raabe Kiadó, Budapest 1–26.
Raátz Judit 2003. A nem nyelvi jelek szerepe az előadásban. In: Róka Jolán szerk., Szónoklatok nagykönyve iskolaigazgatóknak. Raabe Kiadó, Budapest 1–24.
3. Segmental and suprasegmental characteristics of speech
(categorization and description of speech sounds, description of suprasegmentals)
A beszéd szegmentális és szupraszegmentális szintje (a beszédhangok osztályozása és jellemzése; a szupraszegmentumok jellemzése)
Recommended reading:
Markó Alexandra 2017. Hangtan. In: Tolcsvai Nagy Gábor szerk., Nyelvtan. Osiris Kiadó, Budapest. 132–173, 182–198.
- Finno-Ugric studies
(the questions of the Proto-Uralic homeland and language, unscientific theories on language relations)
Finnugrisztika (az uráli őshaza és alapnyelv kérdései, a nyelvrokonság tudománytalan elméletei)
Recommended reading:
Rédei Károly 2003. Őstörténetünk kérdései. A nyelvészeti dilettantizmus kritikája. 2., bővített kiadás. Balassi Kiadó, Budapest. 17–27, 47–56.
- Socially embedded language use
(languages, dialects, registers; language variation, standardisation; mono- and multilingualism; language contact; the Hungarian language and the Hungarian language community, language shift)
A nyelvhasználat társadalmi beágyazottága (nyelvek, nyelvváltozatok, regiszterek; nyelvi változatosság, standardizáció; egy- és többnyelvűség, nyelvi érintkezés; a magyar nyelv és nyelvközösség, nyelvcsere)
Recommended reading:
Sándor Klára 2016. Nyelv és társadalom. Krónika Nova, Budapest. 43–50; 74–76; 85–90. Wardhaugh, Ronald 1995. Szociolingvisztika. Osiris, Budapest. 25–50.
6. Regional language variation and change
(dialects and their categorisation; dialect features; language geography; dialect regions and groups
A nyelv területi változatai és változásuk (a nyelvjárások fogalma, osztályozása; nyelvjárási jelenségek; nyelvföldrajz; nyelvjárási régiók, csoportok)
Recommended reading:
Kiss Jenő szerk. 2001. Magyar dialektológia. Osiris Kiadó, Budapest. 31–45, 92–93, 262– 266.
7. The history of Hungarian
(periods and main events in the history of Hungarian; language contacts in the life of Hungarian)
A magyar nyelvtörténet alapkérdései (a magyar nyelvtörténet korszakai, az egyes korszakok jellemzése; kontaktusnyelvek a magyar nyelv életében)
Recommended reading:
Kiss Jenő 1991. A magyar nyelv. In: Kósa László szerk., A magyarságtudomány kézikönyve.
Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest. 86–145.
8. Word classes, the main word classes as parts of speech
(the main word classes [verbs and non-finite verb forms, nouns, adjectives], the form and meaning of the main/major word classes regarding their parts of speech role)
A szófajok mondatbeli szerepe (az alapszófajú szavak, ezek jelentésének, alakjának és mondatrészszerepének az összefüggései)
Recommended reading:
Keszler Borbála szerk. Magyar grammatika. Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó / Műszaki Könyvkiadó, Budapest. Bármelyik kiadásból a következő fejezetek: A mai magyar nyelv szófaji rendszere; Az ige; A főnév; A melléknév; Az igenevek általános jellemzése.
9. Interpretations of meaning
(the notion of meaning; simple and complex meaning structures)
A jelentés fogalmának értelmezései (a jelentés fogalma; egyszerű és összetett
jelentésszerkezetek)
Recommended reading:
Tolcsvai Nagy Gábor 2010. Kognitív szemantika. Konstantin Filozófus Egyetem, Nyitra, 21– 86.
10. Approaches to text
(the notion of text, coherence in text, structure of the meaning of the text)
A szöveg megközelítései (a szöveg fogalma, a szövegösszetartó erő, a szövegértelem tagolódása)
Recommended reading:
Tolcsvai Nagy Gábor 2005. Szövegtan. In: Kiefer Ferenc főszerk., Magyar nyelv. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest. 149–174.
11. Style in language
(the notion of style, the stylistic potentials of the system of the language, the socio-cultural factors of style, style in the text)
A nyelvi stílus fő jellemzői (a stílus fogalma, a nyelv mint rendszer stíluslehetőségei, a stílus szociokulturális tényezői, stílus a szövegben)
Recommended reading:
Tolcsvai Nagy Gábor 2013. A stílus. In: Bevezetés a kognitív nyelvészetbe. Osiris Kiadó, Budapest. 313–338.
12. Processes of speech production and speech perception
(mechanism of speech production; processes of speech perception)
A beszédprodukció és a beszédmegértés folyamatai (a beszédprodukciós mechanizmus; a beszédpercepció folyamata)
Recommended reading:
Crystal, David 2003. A nyelv enciklopédiája. Osiris Kiadó, Budapest. 184–191.
Gósy Mária 2005. Pszicholingvisztika. Osiris Kiadó, Budapest. 71–73, 83–88, 120–125, 147– 184.
Hungarian literature
- History and types of literary theory / Az irodalomelmélet története és ágazatai
- History of world literature until the end of the 18th century / A világirodalom története a 18. század végéig
- History of world literature from the 18th century to the present / A világirodalom története a 18. századtól napjainkig
- Hungarian literature of the Middle Ages / A középkor magyarországi irodalma
- Genres, authors, works of art in Hungarian literature of the 15th and 16th centuries /
Műfajok, alkotók, művek a 15-16. századi magyarországi irodalomban
- Genres, authors, works of art in Hungarian literature of the 17th and 18th centuries / Műfajok, alkotók művek a 17-18. századi magyarországi irodalomban
- Hungarian Literature of the Enlightenment (from the mid-18th century to the 1820s) / A felvilágosodás korának magyar irodalma (a 18. század közepétől az 1820-as évekig)
- Hungarian literature in the mid-19th century (from the 1820s to the 1860s) / A magyar irodalom a 19. század középső harmadában (az 1820-as évektől az 1860-as évekig)
- Hungarian literature in the second half of the 19th century and at the turn of the century / A 19. század második fele és a századforduló magyar irodalma 10. Hungarian poetry in the 20th century / A magyar líra a 20 században
- Hungarian fiction in the 20th century / A magyar epika a 20. században
- Hungarian drama in the 20th century / A magyar dráma a 20. században Recommended reading:
Bókay, Antal, and Béla Vilcsek, eds. A modern irodalomtudomány kialakulása: a pozitivizmustól a strukturalizmusig. Budapest: Osiris, 1998.
Eagleton, Terry. A fenomenológiától a pszichoanalízisig. Budapest: Helikon, 2002. Gintli, Tibor, ed. Magyar irodalom. Budapest: Akadémiai, 2010.
Gintli, Tibor, and Gábor Schein. Az irodalom rövid története. 1: A kezdetektől a romantikáig. Pécs: Jelenkor, 2003.
———. Az irodalom rövid története. 2: A realizmustól máig. Pécs: Jelenkor, 2007. Pál, József, ed. Világirodalom. Budapest: Akadémiai, 2005.
Szegedy-Maszák, Mihály, ed. A magyar irodalom történetei 1-3. Budapest: Gondolat, 2007.
INSTRUCTION OF ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE MA
Excerpt of the requirements:
Instruction of English as a Foreign Language MA (valid for students admitted in 2019 and thereinafter)_excerpt
Study Programme: Instruction of English as a Foreign Language (for international students) Level of education (BA/MA): MA Valid for students admitted in 2019 and thereafter
Components of the Final Examination:
The final examination consists of two parts: the defense of the thesis and the main subject exam. The examination proceeds as follows:
1. defense of the thesis;
2. main subject exam: the discussion of a topic the student draws and then presents without preparation. The topic is from the general subject area approved by the department and specified on the candidate’s thesis title submission form, approved by the head of the department.
(If one of the topics matches the subject of the thesis, that topic is removed from among the list of questions before the candidate draws one).
Grades received at the Final Examination:
1. grade received for the defense of the thesis
2. grade received for the discussion of a topic during the main subject exam
Overall result (final grade) of the Final Examination:
The final result of the final examination is the mathematical average of the two grades received at the final examination (defense, discussion of a topic). If the candidate fails any of these parts, the relevant regulations of the HKR are to be followed.
Classification of the Diploma:
The degree certificate states the weighted average of the final result of the final examination (A) and the thesis evaluation grade (B) according to the following formula: (A*0,45) + (B*0,55).
Determining the Diploma grade:
Section 84. (6) The diploma is classified according to its average down to two decimals:
− outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
− excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
− good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
− satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
− pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2.49.
Instruction of English as a Foreign Language MA (valid for students admitted in 2019 and thereinafter)_detailed
LOGIC AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE* MA
*From 2017: Logic and Theory of Science, from 2022: Logic and Philosophy of Science Previously, the program was called Logic and Theory of Science. Following the name change, it is now called: Logic and Philosophy Science. Therefore, students are no longer accepted under the previous program name. Excerpt of the requirements:
Logic and Philosophy of Science MA (valid for students admitted in 2017 and thereinafter)_excerpt
Study Programme: Logic and Philosophy of Science (language of instruction: English) Level of education (BA/MA): MA Valid for students admitted in: 2017 and thereafter (from 2017: Logic and Theory of Science, from 2022: Logic and Philosophy of Science) (Previously, the program was called Logic and Theory of Science. Following the name change, it is now called: Logic and Philosophy Science. Therefore, students are no longer accepted under the previous program name.)
Components of the Final Examination:
The final examination for the program is in an oral format. The central part of the exam is (first component) the defense of the thesis based on questions, comments in the written review as well as by members of the defense committee. Students have to demonstrate that they have acquired the core knowledge set out in the training requirements and the curriculum, and are able to explain their theses orally in nuanced and precise terms. Beyond the defense of the thesis, the final examination has a second and third component: the examination covers two previously designated topics for which the student has completed a lecture-format course (marked „K” in the study list). Students are asked thematic questions to determine their level of comprehensive proficiency in these two topics.
The components are therefore:
1. The oral defense of the thesis
2. Selected questions covering the first previously designated topic (first thematic question)
3. Selected questions covering the second previously designated topic (second thematic question)
Grades given/received at the Final Examination:
Evaluation is on a five-grade scale. The examiners assess students’ proficiency in the fields related to the topic of the thesis, as well as the students’ level of professional preparation and ability to participate in scholarly discourse. Three grades are given for the three components of the final examination:
1. A grade for the oral defense of the thesis (B)
2. A grade for the first thematic question (C)
3. A grade for the second thematic question (D)
Overall result (final grade) of the Final Examination:
In the grade received for the final examination (“result” of the final examination), the grade for the oral defense (B) counts 50 %, while the grades for the topics (C and D) count 25-25 %. That is, the final exam grade is the average of these two: B and (C+D)/2. Meanwhile, the defense carries more weight when rounding. This is illustrated with two examples. If the oral defense grade (B) is 5 and the grades for the two thematic questions (C and D) yield an average of 4, then the result of the final examination is 5. By contrast, if the oral defense grade (B) is 4 and the grades for the two thematic questions (C and D) are both 5, yielding an average of 5, then the result of the final examination is 4.
Classification of the Diploma:
The numerical value for the diploma -- diploma “assessment”// minősítés) is the average of the following three numbers:
1. The grade determined by the reviewer for the thesis in the written review (A)
2. The oral defense grade from the final examination (B)
3. The average of the grades for the thematic questions in the final examination (C and D).
That is, the number value for the diploma is calculated as follows: (A + B + ((C + D)/2))/3
(For example, if the grade determined by the reviewer for the thesis in the written review (A) is a 4, the oral defense grade from the final examination (B) is a 5, and the grades for the thematic questions in the final examination (C and D) are 4 and 5, then the classification of the diploma is calculated as follows: (4+5+(4+5)/2) / 3 = (4+5+9/2) / 3 = (4+5+4,5) / 3 = 13,5/3 = 4,5 which means that the classification of the diploma is „excellent”, since 4,5 is rounded to excellent (5).)
Determining the Diploma grade:
As specified in Section 84. (6) of HKR, the diploma is classified according to its average down to two decimals:
− outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
− excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
− good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
− satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
− pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2. 49.
Logic and Philosophy of Science MA (valid for students admitted in 2017 and thereinafter)_detailed
RUSSIAN LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE MA
Excerpt of the requirements:
Russian Language and Literature MA (valid for students admitted in 2018-2024)_excerpt
Study Programme: Russian Language and Literature (language of instruction: Russian) Level of education (BA/MA): MA Valid for students admitted in: 2018-2024
Components of the Final Examination:
A. Presentation of the thesis
B. Defence of the thesis
The final examination consists of two parts: the presentation and defence of the thesis. The student must demonstrate that they have mastered the key knowledge outlined in the qualification requirements and curriculum, and that their verbal communication skills meet the required language proficiency level. First, the student presents the concept, structure, methodology, and key findings of their thesis in a free presentation format. Following this, the committee members pose questions to the student. These questions not only focus on the thesis but also cover broader topics related to Slavonic studies and Russian linguistics, literature/literary history, and cultural history that are part of the knowledge base connected to the thesis. The examination is conducted in Russian.
Grades received at the Final Examination:
The committee assigns one single grade for the examination. The examiners evaluate the student's expertise in the academic fields related to the thesis topic, as well as their professional and linguistic competence, and ability to engage in scientific discourse. The evaluation is carried out on a five-point scale.
Overall result (grade) of the Final Examination:
Based on the criteria described above, the student receives a single grade as the final result of the examination.
Classification of the Diploma:
The grade of the Diploma is the mathematical average of two grades – the Thesis evaluation grade (written part of the Thesis) (A) and the final grade of the Final Examination (B) – rounded to two decimals.
In practice: [(A)+ (B)] / 2
Determining the Diploma grade:
Section 84. (6) The diploma is classified according to its average down to two decimals:
− outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
− excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
− good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
− satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
− pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2.49.
Russian Language and Literature MA (valid for students admitted in2025 and thereinafter)_excerpt
Study Programme: Russian Language and Literature (language of instruction: Russian) Level of education (BA/MA): MA Valid for students admitted in: 2025 and thereafter
Components of the Final Examination:
A. Presentation of the thesis
B. Defence of the thesis
The final examination consists of two parts: the presentation and defence of the thesis. The student must demonstrate that they have mastered the key knowledge outlined in the qualification requirements and curriculum, and that their verbal communication skills meet the required language proficiency level. First, the student presents the concept, structure, methodology, and key findings of their thesis in a free presentation format. Following this, the committee members pose questions to the student. These questions not only focus on the thesis but also cover broader topics related to Slavonic studies and Russian linguistics, literature/literary history, and cultural history that are part of the knowledge base connected to the thesis. The examination is conducted in Russian.
Grades received at the Final Examination:
The committee assigns one single grade for the examination. The examiners evaluate the student's expertise in the academic fields related to the thesis topic, as well as their professional and linguistic competence, and ability to engage in scientific discourse. The evaluation is carried out on a five-point scale.
Overall result (grade) of the Final Examination:
Based on the criteria described above, the student receives a single grade as the final result of the examination.
Classification of the Diploma:
The grade of the Diploma is the weighted average of two grades – the Thesis evaluation grade (written part of the Thesis) counted once (A) and the final grade of the Final Examination (B) counted twice.
In practice: [(A)+ [(B)x2]] / 2
Determining the Diploma grade:
Section 84. (6) The diploma is classified according to its average down to two decimals:
− outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
− excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
− good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
− satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
− pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2.49.
Russian Language and Literature MA (valid for students admitted in 2018-2024)_detailed
RUSSIAN LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE MA PROGRAMME
Department in charge of the programme:
Department of Russian Language and Literature
For students admitted in 2018-2024
THESIS AND FINAL EXAM REQUIREMENTS
Thesis
Formal requirements:
– Minimum 80 000 characters (excluding the title page, the content page and the bibliography),
1.5 line spacing, Times New Roman font, 12p letter size. The Thesis must be digital, and it
has to be uploaded to Neptun study system as a PDF or Word document.
– It is only possible to submit the Thesis in one file, so any attachments, appendix should be
merged into one file.
– The title page has to contain the name of the student, the title of the Thesis in Hungarian and
in the language of instruction (Russian), the supervisor’s name, the name of the university
and the faculty, the study progamme, and the year of submission.
– Student has to claim that the Thesis is his/her own intellectual product (check the plagiarism
rules of the university)
– From 2021, every Thesis requires the supervisor’s consent for submission (details on the
Faculty webpage)
Requirements for the content:
– Students may select the topic of their degree thesis from any of the subject within the
Russian Language and Literature programme. Students must demonstrate that they are
capable of synthesizing the acquired knowledge at an advanced level, possess the knowledge
necessary for academic work, and are able to use the Russian language at advanced level.
The thesis may be theoretical in nature or—where experimentation or observation is
possible (e.g., in linguistics, applied linguistics)—practical. The thesis should be based on the
academic literature relevant to the topic.
Evaluation:
Evaluation is given on a five-grade scale, 1 to 5 (five being the top grade), taking into consideration
the scientific results and the logic of their presentation, the linguistic, stylistic formulation and the
range and depth of the critical literature consulted and involved in the argumentation.
REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPLETION OF THE MA PROGRAMME
Condition required to take the Final Examination
· absolutorium
· Thesis submitted, and it has a pass grade
· Returning all property borrowed from the university (debts, books/overdue fine to the
library…etc.)
Final Examination:
The final examination consists of two parts: the presentation and defence of the thesis. The student
must demonstrate that they have mastered the key knowledge outlined in the qualification requirements
and curriculum, and that their verbal communication skills meet the required language proficiency level.
First, the student presents the concept, structure, methodology, and key findings of their thesis in a free
presentation format. Following this, the committee members pose questions to the student. These
questions not only focus on the thesis but also cover broader topics related to Slavonic studies and
Russian linguistics, literature/literary history, and cultural history that are part of the knowledge base
connected to the thesis.
The examination is conducted in Russian.
Evaluation of the Final Examination:
The committee assigns one single grade for the examination. The examiners evaluate the student's
expertise in the academic fields related to the thesis topic, as well as their professional and linguistic
competence, and ability to engage in scientific discourse. The evaluation is carried out on a five-point
scale.
Final Result of the Final Examination:
Based on the criteria described above, the student receives a single grade as the final result of the
examination.
Grading of the Degree Certificate:
The grade of the Diploma is the mathematical average of two grades – the Thesis evaluation grade
(written part of the Thesis) (A) and the final grade of the Final Examination (B) – rounded to two
decimals.
In practice: [(A)+ (B)] / 2
Classification of the Degree Certificate:
As specified in Section 84. (6), the diploma is classified according to its average down to two decimals:
• outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
• excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
• good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
• satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
• pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2.49.
Further information for graduation: list of topics and literature for the Final Exam preparation:
There are no specific lists of topics for the final exam preparation. Information about the expected
linguistic and literary knowledge can be found in the topic lists and preparation guidelines for the
Comprehensive Exam in Russian Linguistics and Literature (BMI-OROD18-451R) subject of the
programme, which are available on the website of the Department of Russian Language and Literature.
From this material, the examiners will assess the knowledge related to the academic field, which the
thesis represents.
Russian Language and Literature MA (valid for students admitted in2025 and thereinafter)_detailed
RUSSIAN LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE MA PROGRAMME
Department in charge of the programme:
Department of Russian Language and Literature
For students admitted in 2025 and thereinafter
THESIS AND FINAL EXAM REQUIREMENTS
Thesis
Formal requirements:
– Minimum 80 000 characters (excluding the title page, the content page and the bibliography),
1.5 line spacing, Times New Roman font, 12p letter size. The Thesis must be digital, and it
has to be uploaded to Neptun study system as a PDF or Word document.
– It is only possible to submit the Thesis in one file, so any attachments, appendix should be
merged into one file.
– The title page has to contain the name of the student, the title of the Thesis in Hungarian and
in the language of instruction (Russian), the supervisor’s name, the name of the university
and the faculty, the study progamme, and the year of submission.
– Student has to claim that the Thesis is his/her own intellectual product (check the plagiarism
rules of the university)
– From 2021, every Thesis requires the supervisor’s consent for submission (details on the
Faculty webpage)
Requirements for the content:
– Students may select the topic of their degree thesis from any of the subject within the
Russian Language and Literature programme. Students must demonstrate that they are
capable of synthesizing the acquired knowledge at an advanced level, possess the knowledge
necessary for academic work, and are able to use the Russian language at advanced level.
The thesis may be theoretical in nature or—where experimentation or observation is
possible (e.g., in linguistics, applied linguistics)—practical. The thesis should be based on the
academic literature relevant to the topic.
Evaluation:
Evaluation is given on a five-grade scale, 1 to 5 (five being the top grade), taking into consideration
the scientific results and the logic of their presentation, the linguistic, stylistic formulation and the
range and depth of the critical literature consulted and involved in the argumentation.
REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPLETION OF THE MA PROGRAMME
Condition required to take the Final Examination
· absolutorium
· Thesis submitted, and it has a pass grade
· Returning all property borrowed from the university (debts, books/overdue fine to the
library…etc.)
Final Examination:
The final examination consists of two parts: the presentation and defence of the thesis. The student
must demonstrate that they have mastered the key knowledge outlined in the qualification requirements
and curriculum, and that their verbal communication skills meet the required language proficiency level.
First, the student presents the concept, structure, methodology, and key findings of their thesis in a free
presentation format. Following this, the committee members pose questions to the student. These
questions not only focus on the thesis but also cover broader topics related to Slavonic studies and
Russian linguistics, literature/literary history, and cultural history that are part of the knowledge base
connected to the thesis.
The examination is conducted in Russian.
Evaluation of the Final Examination:
The committee assigns one single grade for the examination. The examiners evaluate the student's
expertise in the academic fields related to the thesis topic, as well as their professional and linguistic
competence, and ability to engage in scientific discourse. The evaluation is carried out on a five-point
scale.
Final Result of the Final Examination:
Based on the criteria described above, the student receives a single grade as the final result of the
examination.
Grading of the Degree Certificate:
The grade of the Diploma is the weighted average of two grades – the Thesis evaluation grade (written
part of the Thesis) counted once (A) and the final grade of the Final Examination (B) counted twice.
In practice: [(A)+ [(B)x2]] / 2
Classification of the Degree Certificate:
As specified in Section 84. (6), the diploma is classified according to its average down to two decimals:
• outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
• excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
• good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
• satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
• pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2.49.
Further information for graduation: list of topics and literature for the Final Exam preparation:
There are no specific lists of topics for the final exam preparation. Information about the expected
linguistic and literary knowledge can be found in the topic lists and preparation guidelines for the
Comprehensive Exam in Russian Linguistics and Literature (BMI-OROD18-451R) subject of the
programme, which are available on the website of the Department of Russian Language and Literature.
From this material, the examiners will assess the knowledge related to the academic field, which the
thesis represents.
SEMIOTICS MA
Excerpt of the requirements:
Semiotics MA (valid for students admitted in 2016 and thereinafter)_excerpt
Study Programme: Semiotics (in English) Level of education (BA/MA): MA Valid from (for students admitted in): valid for all students
Components of the Final Examination:
The Final Examination consists of two parts, both oral:
a) the defence of the Thesis
b) examination on the basis of open questions previously listed from which examination questions are selected
Grades received at the Final Examination:
a) grade received for the Thesis defence
b) grade received for the answer given to the open questions selected from the list
Overall result (final grade) of the Final Examination:
Evaluation is given on a five-grade scale, 1 to 5 (five being the top grade). The final result of the Final Examination is the mathematical average of the grades achieved in the two parts (Thesis defence, answer to the open question).
Classification of the Diploma:
The grade of the Diploma is the mathematical average of two grades – the Thesis evaluation grade and the final grade of the Final Examination – rounded to two decimals.
Determining the Diploma grade:
As specified in Section 84. (6), the diploma is classified according to its average down to two decimals:
− outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
− excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
− good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
− satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
− pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2.49.
Semiotics MA (valid for students admitted in 2016 and thereinafter)_detailed
SEMIOTICS MA PROGRAMME
Department in charge of the programme:
Department of Russian Language and Literature
THESIS AND FINAL EXAM REQUIREMENTS
Thesis
Formal requirements:
– Minimum 80 000 characters (excluding the title page, the content page and the bibliography),
1.5 line spacing, Times New Roman font, 12p letter size. The Thesis must be digital, and it
has to be uploaded to Neptun study system as a PDF or Word document.
– It is only possible to submit the Thesis in one file, so any attachments, appendix should be
merged into one file.
– The title page has to contain the name of the student, the title of the Thesis, the supervisor’s
name, the name of the university and the faculty + the study progamme, and the date of
submission
– Student has to claim that the Thesis is his/her own intellectual product (check the plagiarism
rules of the university)
– From 2021, every Thesis requires the supervisor’s consent for submission (details on the
Faculty webpage)
Requirements for the content:
– Students may select the topic of their degree thesis from any of the subject areas taught
under the conditions set by the respective departments in the semiotic programme.
– Students must demonstrate that they are capable of producing an extended piece of
academic writing, putting the synthetic presentation of a topic into the context of
international critical literature, and arguing their own views against an expert in the field.
– Both a theoretical and practical orientation may be selected. Students are discouraged from
writing a thesis on the same topic they have submitted for any previous degree. What
qualifies as the same topic is at the discretion of the Programme Director in consultation
with the student.
Evaluation:
Evaluation is given on a five-grade scale, 1 to 5 (five being the top grade), taking into consideration
the scientific results and the logic of their presentation, the linguistic, stylistic formulation and the
range and depth of the critical literature consulted and involved in the argumentation.
REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPLETION OF THE MA PROGRAMME
• documentation demonstrating the completion of all courses (called an Absolutorium);
• the submission and defence of the thesis with a grade of at least 2 and a successful
examination in the broader thematics of the material in the thesis (at the Final Examination,
see also the other requirements for the final examination in detail).
Condition required to take the Final Examination
• absolutorium
• Thesis submitted, and it has a pass grade
• Returning all property borrowed from the university (debts, books/overdue fine to the
library…etc.)
Final Examination:
It consists of two parts, both oral:
a) the defense of the thesis
b) examination on the basis of open questions previously listed from which examination
questions are selected
Evaluation of the Final Examination:
Evaluation is given on a five-grade scale, 1 to 5 (five being the top grade). The overall final
examination result is the mathematical average of the marks achieved in the two parts (Thesis
defence, answer to the open question).
Further information for graduation: list of topics and literature for the Final Exam
preparation:
General topics, in which the programme coordinator can determine some specific
questions:
1) Theoretical foundations of semiotics
2) Significant milestones in the history of semiotics
3) Semiotics and the related fields of science
4) Semiotics and the history of culture
5) Branches of semiotics
6) Semiotics of the Hungarian culture
7) Visual semiotics
8) Sign systems and how they work
9) Types and processes of semiotic text analysis
10) Applied semiotics
11) Significant chapters of the literature regarding semiotics (20th century)
12) Scientific career of semiotists
The literature for preparation includes all the readings in the course descriptions of the subjects during the studies. The lists and descriptions are published in the semesters when the subjects are taken.
Grading of the Degree Certificate:
The grade of the Degree Certificate is the mathematical average of two grades – the Thesis evaluation
grade and the final grade of the Final Examination – rounded to two decimals. As specified in Section
84. (6), the diploma is classified according to its average down to two decimals:
• outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
• excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
• good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
• satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
• pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2.49.
SPANISH LANGUAGE, LITERATURE AND CULTURE MA
Excerpt of the requirements:
Spanish Language, Literature and Culture MA (valid for students admitted in 2017 and thereinafter)_excerpt
Study Programme: Spanish Language, Literature and Culture (language of instruction: Spanish) Level of education (BA/MA): MA Valid for students admitted in 2017 and thereafter
Components of the Final Examination:
1) Presentation and defence of the Thesis:
a. presentation: (max. 10 minutes): The student explains why the chosen topic for their thesis is relevant, demonstrates that they have specific knowledge of the topic, presents the methodology used during their research, and the most important results of their work.
b. defence: The student answers the written questions proposed in the Thesis evaluation. The members of the committee may also ask their own questions
2) Answering questions related to the topic of the Thesis: In order to define the topic more precisely, the applicant – in agreement with their supervisor – must select the topics (textbooks, sources) they will use for preparation beforehand. The student must have these approved by the reviewing professor.
Grades received at the Final Examination:
1) Grade received for the presentation and defence of the Thesis
2) Grade received for the answers to questions related to the topic of the Thesis
Overall result (final grade) of the Final Examination:
The overall result states the arithmetic average of the two grades received at the Final Examination [(1) grade received for the presentation and defence of the Thesis; (2) grade received for the answers to questions related to the topic of the Thesis] The result is rounded towards the grade given for the first part [(1) grade received for the presentation and defence of the Thesis].
Classification of the Diploma:
The degree certificate states the mathematical average of the Thesis evaluation grade (written part of the Thesis) (A) and the final grade received at the Final Examination (B), rounded to two decimals.
In practice: [(A)+(B)] / 2
Determining the Diploma grade:
Section 84. (6) The diploma is classified according to its average down to two decimals:
− outstanding (5), if the average is 4.80–5.00,
− excellent (5), if the average is 4.50–4.79,
− good (4), if the average is 3.50–4.49,
− satisfactory (3), if the average is 2.50–3.49,
− pass (2), if the average is 2.00–2.49.
Spanish Language, Literature and Culture MA (valid for students admitted in 2017 and thereinafter)_detailed
MÁSTER (MA) DE LENGUA, LITERATURA Y CULTURA HISPÁNICAS (2017-)
El número de créditos que se deben obtener para superar con éxito el nivel máster:
120 créditos
REQUISITOS CON RESPECTO AL TRABAJO FIN DE CARRERA Y AL EXAMEN FIN DE CARRERA:
Trabajo fin de carrera:
Requisitos formales:
– El trabajo fin de carrera debe ser entregado en formato impreso y también electrónico, con una extensión mínima de 75.00 caracteres sin espacio. Esta extensión se debe alcanzar contando tan solo las páginas con texto real, sin incluirse la portada, el índice, la bibliografía, etc.
– El trabajo se debe hacer en el idioma correspondiente al máster, o sea, en español.
– El estudiante debe entregar una declaración a través del sistema electrónico de estudios NEPTUN sobre el hecho de que el trabajo final de carrera es su propia creación.
Requisitos de contenido:
– El tema del trabajo fin de carrera se debe elegir de entre los temas tratados en la especialidad determinada.
– El trabajo sirve para que el estudiante demuestre su capacidad de sintetizar los conocimientos obtenidos, de dar los pasos necesarios para realizar un trabajo de carácter científico, expresándose en el idioma en cuestión en un nivel alto tanto desde el punto de vista estilístico como didáctico.
– En cuanto al carácter del trabajo, puede ser teórico o práctico (éste último en los ámbitos donde se pueden llevar a cabo observaciones o experimentos – como, por ejemplo, la lingüística o la lingüística aplicada).
– Es recomendable que el trabajo sea realizado basándose en la bibliografía más reciente (y si es necesario también la más antigua).
Valoración:
Con notas entre 1 y 5, siendo éste último el nivel más alto.
Requisitos para terminar sus estudios en el ciclo MA:
Solamente podrá pasar el examen fin de carrera el estudiante que cumpla con los siguientes requisitos: obtención del certificado final (llamado „abszolutórium”) y el trabajo fin de carrera aceptado. El examen fin de carrera tiene lugar en el cuarto o último semestre de los estudios.
En el examen fin de carrera el estudiante debe demostrar que posee los conocimientos más importantes determinados en el plan de estudios (el departamento puede preparar una lista con los temas del examen, con las referencias bibliográficas corrrespondientes). En el caso de
especialidades que no cuenten con un examen de lengua específico, el estudiante debe demostrar en el mismo examen fin de carrera que su nivel de expresión oral corresponde al nivel C2 del examen de idioma oficial. Los conocimientos que se valoran en el examen fin de carrera pertenecen al ámbito de los temas tratados en el trabajo fin de carrera.
El examen fin de carrera consta de las siguientes partes:
1) Defensa del trabajo final de carrera: El estudiante presenta su trabajo final de carrera en 10 minutos como máximo. El estudiante explica por qué es relevante el tema que escogió para su trabajo, demuestra que posee los conocimientos específicos sobre el tema, presenta el método que siguió durante sus investigaciones y los resultados más importantes de su trabajo. A continuación, el estudiante contesta las preguntas expresadas en forma escrita por la persona que había evaluado el trabajo; los miembros del jurado también pueden formular sus propias preguntas.
2) Preguntas relacionadas con el tema del trabajo: para determinar el tema concreto del examen, el estudiante debe hablar con anticipación con el profesor que dirige sus investigaciones y determinan juntos los temas (manuales, fuentes) de los cuales debe servirse para la preparación del examen. El profesor que evalúa el trabajo también debe dar su visto bueno a los temas elegidos.
Evaluación del examen:
Cada uno de los miembros del jurado evalúa al estudiante por separado (con una nota entre 1 y 5, siendo éste último el nivel más alto). La nota final del examen es la media de todas las notas recibidas.
Las calificaciones del examen final se obtendrán mediante:
– la calificación obtenida por la presentación y defensa del trabajo final de carrera,
– la calificación obtenida por las respuestas orales relacionadas con el tema del trabajo final de carrera.
La media aritmética de las notas del examen final será redondeada hacia la calificación obtenida en la primera parte, es decir, por la presentación y defensa de la tesis.
REQUISITOS PARA QUE EL ESTUDIANTE PUEDA PASAR EL EXAMEN FIN DE CARRERA:
Para que el estudiante pueda presentarse al examen fin de carrera, debe haber superado las asignaturas que aparecen a continuación, en la lista de asignaturas; y debe tener un certificado sobre el hecho de haber devuelto todos los objetos prestados (libros) al Instituto.
CALIFICACIÓN DEL DIPLOMA:
La calificación del diploma es la media de las notas obtenidas por el trabajo fin de carrera y el examen fin de carrera, redondeada a un número entero.
La calificación del diploma se basa en el resultado promedio calculado con dos decimales:
− excelente si el promedio es 4,80-5,00,
− sobresaliente si el promedio es 4,50-4,79,
− notable si el promedio es 3,50-4,49,
− bien, si el promedio es 2,50-3,49,
− suficiente si el promedio es 2,00-2,49
TEMAS Y BIBLIOGRAFÍA:
Literatura
1. La tradición del Siglo de Oro español en la literatura hispanoamericana (herencias de motivos, géneros o procedimientos discursivos etc.)
Pedraza Jiménez, Felipe – Rodríguez Cáceres, Milagros: Las épocas de la literatura española.
Ariel, Barcelona, 1997.
Rico, Francisco: Historia y crítica de la literatura española. Vols. 3-9, Crítica, Barcelona, 2004.
2. La épocas literarias de Hispanoamérica a través de ejemplos concretos
Goic, C.: Historia y crítica de la literatura hispanoamericana. Crítica, Barcelona,1988.
Oviedo, J. M.: Historia de la literatura hispanoamericana. I-IV. Alianza, Madrid, 2002.
3. La narrativa hispanoamericana (con la ilustración de uno o dos ejemplos)
Oviedo, J. M.: Historia de la literatura hispanoamericana. I-IV. Alianza, Madrid, 2002. Scholz, László: A spanyol-amerikai irodalom története. Gondolat, Budapest, 2005.
Shaw, D. L.: Nueva narrativa hispanoamericana. Cátedra, Madrid, 1981.
4. La poesía hispanoamericana A spanyol-amerikai költészet műfaja (con la ilustración de uno o dos ejemplos) Ortega, Julio: Antología de la poesía hispanoamericana actual. Siglo Veintiuno Eds., México,
1987.
Oviedo, J. M.: Historia de la literatura hispanoamericana. I-IV. Alianza, Madrid, 2002.
Scholz, László: A spanyol-amerikai irodalom története. Gondolat, Budapest, 2005.
5. El ensayo hispanoamericano ((con la ilustración de uno o dos ejemplos)
Oviedo, J. M.: Historia de la literatura hispanoamericana. I-IV. Alianza, Madrid, 2002.
Ripoll, Carlos: Conciencia intelectual de América Latina. Eliseo Torres, New York, 1974.
Scholz, László: A spanyol-amerikai irodalom története. Gondolat, Budapest, 2005.
6. El encuentro de culturas: la época prehispánica y la virreinal
Oviedo, J. M.: Historia de la literatura hispanoamericana. I-II. Alianza, Madrid, 2002.
Pastor, Beatriz: Discursos narrativos de la conquista. Ed. Del Norte, Hannover, 1983.
Pupo-Walker, Enrique: La vocación literaria del pensamiento histórico en América. Gredos, Madrid, 1982.
Scholz, László: A spanyol-amerikai irodalom története. Gondolat, Budapest, 2005.
7. Cuestiones candentes de la cultura hispánica actual
Barrero Pérez, Oscar: Historia de la literatura española contemporánea. Istmo, Madrid, 1992.
Chang-Rodríguez, Eugenio: Latinoamérica: su civilización y su cultura. Newbury House Publishers, Rowley, MA, 1983.
Fusi, Juan Pablo: Un siglo de España. La cultura. Marcial Pons, Ediciones de Historia,Madrid, 1999.
Rico, Francisco: Historia y crítica de la literatura española. 6. Modernismo y 98. (6/1. Primer suplemento) 7. Época contemporánea: 1914-1939. Crítica, Barcelona, 1980-1983.
8. Las literaturas hispánicas en sus traducciones húngaras A spanyol nyelvű irodalmak magyar fordításban (la necesidad de las retraducciones, obras que faltan etc.)
Scholz, László: A spanyol-amerikai irodalom története. Gondolat, Budapest, 2005.
Traducción literaria y estudios de traducción
1. Teorías traductológicas en el siglo XX
Kettős megvilágítás. Fordításelméleti írások Szent Jeromostól a 20. század végéig. Eds.
Józan, Jeney, Hajdú, Bp. Balassi, 2000
The Translation Studies Reader. Ed. Venuti, London-NY, Routledge, 2000
Textos clásicos de teoría de la traducción. Ed. Vega, Cátedra, Madrid, 1994
Moya, Virgilio: La selva de la traducción. Teorías traductológicas contemporáneas. Madrid, Cátedra, 2004
2. Formas y posibilidades de la crítica de la traducción literaria
Papp Gyögry: Milyen kritika a fordításkritika? Tóthfalu, Logos, 2000
A „boldog Bábel”. Tanulmányok az irodalmi fordításról. Eds. Józan Ildikó, Szegedy-Maszák
Mihály. Bp. Gondolat, 2005
Lefevere, André: Translating Literature. Practice and Theory in a Comparative Literature
Context, MLA, New York, 1992
Levine, Suzanne Jill: The Subversive Scribe, St. Paul, Graywolf, 1991
A. Popovič: A műfordítás elmélete, Madách, 1980
3. La traducción como fenómeno histórico-cultural en América Latina
Translating Latin America: Culture as Text. Translation Perspectives VI, 1991, Luis, W.
- Rodíguez-Luis, J. (eds.), Binghamton
Voice-overs. Translation and Latin American Literature. Eds. D. Balderston, M. E. Schwartz, Albany, SUNY, 2002
El reverso del tapiz. Antología de textos teóricos lationaomericanos sobre la traducción literaria. Ed. L. Scholz, Bp. Eötvös J., 2003
Carbonell I Cortés, Ovidi: Traducir al Otro. Traducción, exotismo, poscolonialismo, Ed. U de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, 1997
Lingüística
1. La lingüística como ciencia cognitiva. Características del lenguaje humano. Orígenes de la lingüística moderna
(Hualde, Olarrea, Escobar: Introducción a la lingüística hispánica; R. H. Robins: Breve historia de la lingüística; D. Crystal: Enciclopedia del lenguaje; L. Scholz -- J. Zavaleta: Crestomatía de textos lingüísticos; F. de Saussure: Curso de lingüística general)
2. Lengua, variedades lingüísticas, dialectos, relaciones lingüísticas, bilingüismo en el mundo hispánico
(C. Silva-Corvalán: Sociolingüística y pragmática del español; C. A. Klee -- A. Lynch: El español en contacto; Hualde, Olarrea, Escobar: Introducción a la lingüística hispánica; R. H.
Robins: Breve historia de la lingüística; D. Crystal: Enciclopedia del lenguaje)
3. Modificaciones de la lengua, lingüística histórica y comparativa. El latín y las lenguas románicas
(C. Silva-Corvalán: Sociolingüística y pragmática del español; R. H. Robins: Breve historia de la lingüística; L. Scholz -- J. Zavaleta: Crestomatía de textos lingüísticos)
4. Variedades americanas de la lengua española, criterios de clasificación. Lenguas pidgin y criollas
(J. Lipski: El español de América; Hualde, Olarrea, Escobar: Introducción a la lingüística hispánica; C. Silva-Corvalán: Sociolingüística y pragmática del español)
School of English and American Studies (SEAS) -- Graduation information
Graduation 2023/24/2 (SPRING)
Administrative steps of graduation:
1) Register for Final Examination in Neptun until the deadline indicated in the academic calendar. Repeated Final Exams must also be recorded.
- for BA students ONLY: Record main topic of Final Exam (found on the title submission form you submitted last semester or earlier) and chosen subsidiary topic by entering your data HERE. Deadline for filling in the form in the 2023/24/2 semester: 16th April 2024.
2) Submit your Thesis in Neptun until the deadline indicated in the academic calendar. (There is no opportunity for late Thesis submission!)
3) Upload your Thesis at SEAS website: http://seas.elte.hu/dokuwiki/studies/graduation/thesis/submit
More information about thesis writing and final examinations
BA requirements for graduation
MA Students:
Institute of Germanic Studies - Graduation information
GERMANIC STUDIES, SPECIALIZED IN GERMAN STUDIES BA
GERMAN LANGUAGE, LITERATURE AND CULTURE MA
GERMANIC STUDIES, SPECIALIZED IN NETHERLANDIC STUDIES BA
Institute of Romance Studies -- Graduation information
ROMANCE PHILOLOGY / NEO-LATIN LANGUAGES AND CULTURES, SPECIALIZED IN FRENCH STUDIES BA
FRENCH LANGUAGE, LITERATURE AND CULTURE MA
ROMANCE PHILOLOGY / NEO-LATIN LANGUAGES AND CULTURES, SPECIALIZED IN PORTUGUESE STUDIES BA
ROMANCE PHILOLOGY / NEO-LATIN LANGUAGES AND CULTURES, SPECIALIZED IN ROMANIAN STUDIES BA
ROMANCE PHILOLOGY / NEO-LATIN LANGUAGES AND CULTURES, SPECIALIZED IN ROMANIAN STUDIES MA
Hungarian BA - Graduation information
Film Studies MA - Graduation information
Please find the Thesis requirements of Film Studies MA here:
Film Studies Thesis Requirements
Please find the Final Exam information of Film Studies MA here: